Technically Incorrect gives a barely twisted tackle the tech that is taken over our lives.
It cannot be straightforward watching somebody main the polls by a large margin and truly win an election.
For dropping US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, due to this fact, seeing Emmanuel Macron successful the French presidential elections incited combined emotions.
She took to Twitter on Sunday to muse: “Victory for Macron, for France, the EU, & the world.” Many would possibly see it this fashion. He was positively not the candidate that many imagine to be overtly racist.
Still, Clinton wasn’t accomplished. She added: “Defeat to those interfering w/democracy. (But the media says I can’t talk about that).”
Last week, Clinton offered a few reasons why she believed she misplaced to Donald Trump.
Among them: “I was on the way to winning until a combination of Jim Comey’s letter on October 28 and Russian WikiLeaks raised doubts in the minds of people who were inclined to vote for me and got scared off.”
Many observers believe that Russian operatives once more tried to intervene within the French elections. Clinton’s sniping at the media — at least she did not name it faux — is probably going a response to some pointing out that she’d “had her turn” and that the Russians did not cease her from campaigning in, say, Wisconsin — which she omitted to do.
The president has already made his emotions on Clinton’s clarification clear.
“FBI Director Comey was the best thing that ever happened to Hillary Clinton in that he gave her a free pass for many bad deeds! The phony Trump/Russia story was an excuse used by the Democrats as justification for losing the election. Perhaps Trump just ran a great campaign?” he mentioned in two tweets.
The FBI, nonetheless, remains to be investigating Russian connections with the Trump marketing campaign. What would Clinton tweet if there was discovered to have been collusion? I fancy there could be a tweetstorm.